Skip to main content

H2 Acceptance Report

Issue: sci-dug.3
Date: June 7, 2026
Gate: 02 H2 metric reconstruction from pulse comparisons

Verdict

H2 is accepted at the ideal fixed-event level and partially accepted at the finite-data prototype level.

Accepted:

  • ideal fixed-event uniqueness of the Lorentzian metric under the reviewed assumptions
  • separation of metric uniqueness from event-manifold identification
  • finite pulse-record schema for practical records
  • first executable finite-data slices for Minkowski, weak-static, stationary direction timing, Shapiro-style spatial delay, and weak-wave differential arm timing, with the Shapiro and weak-wave slices treated as calibrated response benchmarks rather than full raw-record schema implementations
  • finite-data gauge and stability conditions for restricted ansatz fits, with first-slice uncertainty propagation demonstrated in code
  • sufficient raw-relational conditions for promoting event graphs to fixed-event inputs

Not accepted:

  • general reconstruction of an arbitrary metric from sparse finite records
  • automatic raw-relational derivation of the smooth event manifold, clock embeddings, or proof-grade signal directions for arbitrary records
  • practical metric reconstruction without a stated ansatz, gauge convention, calibration model, and nuisance model

Artifacts

Proof and schema:

Code:

  • src/pulse_model/h2_reconstruction.py

Executable checks:

  • tests/test_h2_reconstruction.py

Accepted Ideal Result

The ideal H2 theorem proves the following bounded statement:

Given a fixed smooth event region, incidence map, embedded clock segments, proof-grade signal directions or infinitesimal signal curves, dense null-rich signal data, clock-rich timelike samples, calibrated universal clocks, and a compatible Lorentzian metric, no second compatible Lorentzian metric exists on that fixed-event realization.

The proof strategy is:

  • signal directions determine the null cone
  • null cones determine the conformal metric class
  • calibrated pulse-derived timelike durations fix the conformal factor
  • coordinate freedom remains as diffeomorphism gauge

This is enough to make [gμν][g_{\mu\nu}] the right ideal H2 target.

The raw-relational appendix states sufficient conditions under which event graphs can supply the fixed-event inputs. It is not a proof that arbitrary raw pulse records automatically produce the event manifold or signal tangent directions.

Accepted Finite Prototype Result

The finite-data work is accepted only as a restricted prototype.

Implemented slices:

SliceAccepted resultGauge or ansatz
Minkowski static clocksEqual pulse-derived clock rates recover the flat static-clock sliceReference-clock time-scale gauge
Weak static fieldClock ratios recover potential differencesReference clock fixes additive potential convention
Stationary direction timingCounter-propagating signal times recover a signed timing asymmetryObservable asymmetry, not unique coordinate g0ig_{0i}
Spatial delayShapiro-style benchmark records recover a γ\gamma proxyCalibrated endpoint geometry and mass model supplied as interpretation metadata
Weak waveDifferential arm timing benchmark records recover injected h+h_+Fixed arm geometry, polarization basis, and long-wavelength approximation supplied as interpretation metadata

The prototype demonstrates that selected pulse/signal-style records and calibrated response benchmarks can recover selected metric-response parameters with explicit tolerances and uncertainty propagation. It does not yet reconstruct a general metric field or implement the full finite schema for every slice.

Stability And Gauge Decision

Finite H2 stability is accepted only under the conditions in the stability appendix:

  • the metric or response ansatz is stated
  • gauge choices are stated
  • nuisance variables are fixed, bounded, or jointly estimated
  • the residual and covariance model are stated
  • the gauge-fixed Jacobian or equivalent sensitivity calculation is full rank for the claimed parameters
  • uncertainty propagation is reported
  • known degeneracies are named

The current executable prototype satisfies the first-slice gauge conventions and closed-form uncertainty propagation checks. It does not yet satisfy the full Jacobian/covariance stability program for arbitrary finite networks, all nuisance parameters, or full metric-field reconstruction.

Remaining Assumptions

H2 still depends on:

  • clock universality after calibration
  • signal propagation by the relevant null structure
  • correct signal-link labels
  • controlled environmental clock shifts
  • enough clock and signal richness for the claimed ansatz
  • explicit gauge fixing
  • correct nuisance modeling
  • finite-data sensitivity above numerical and measurement noise floors
  • raw-relational event and signal identifiability conditions for claims beyond fixed-event reconstruction

H3 Start Decision

H3 can safely start, with a boundary.

H3 may use the ideal fixed-event H2 result as a metric equivalence-class input:

[gμν][g_{\mu\nu}]

It may also use the finite prototype outputs as toy or ansatz-level reconstructed metric-response data.

H3 must not assume that H2 has already solved raw-relational event-manifold identification or arbitrary sparse finite-data metric reconstruction. The first H3 task should define a loop observable against a fixed-event or explicitly gauge-fixed reconstructed metric object, then state which parts depend on later H2 strengthening.

Gate Decision

The 02 H2 metric reconstruction from pulse comparisons gate is:

  • accepted for the ideal fixed-event uniqueness theorem
  • partially accepted for finite-data reconstruction prototypes under stated ansatz and gauge conditions, with full finite-data stability still conditional
  • conditional for raw-relational identifiability under the sufficient conditions in the appendix
  • not accepted for arbitrary sparse-record metric reconstruction

This is sufficient to unblock the first H3 loop-observable work, provided H3 keeps the fixed-event and gauge boundaries explicit.